Причиной такого заключения возможно

Причиной такого заключения возможно является то что глобальная политики 21 века кардинально отличается от периода холодной войны. Именно об этом в своей статье пишет James Doyle (2013). С его точки зрения, что проблема ядерного нераспространения охватила новые государства и в настоящее время вопрос безопасности значительно отличается от previous века. Более того прошедшие исторические события которые привели к концу Холодную войну подорвали авторитет к ядерному оружию и к его сдерживанию, тем самым появилось возможность обеспечить национальную безопасность многим странам. Далее автор заключает что некоторые ученные стали оценивать полезность такого оружия и посветили учения тому чтобы найди баланс между пользой и риском от ядерного сдерживания.

Результаты (английский) 1:

The reason for this conclusion possible is that global policies 21 century is fundamentally different from the cold war period. It is about this in his article, writes James Doyle (2013). In his view, that the problem of nuclear non-proliferation has covered the new States and security currently differs significantly from the previous century. Moreover the past historical events that led to the end of the cold war undermined the credibility of nuclear weapons and to contain it, thus appeared an opportunity to ensure the national security of many countries. Further, the author concludes that some scientists began to assess the usefulness of such weapons and dedicated exercises to find the balance between benefit and risk of nuclear deterrence.

Результаты (английский) 2:

The reason for such a conclusion possible is that global politics of the 21st century is radically different from the Cold War period. That's about it in his article writes James Doyle (2013). In his view, the problem of nuclear non-proliferation embraced the new states and is now a security issue differs considerably from the previous century. Furthermore past historical events that led to the end of the Cold War undermined the credibility of nuclear weapons and to deter it, thus will be able to ensure the national security of many countries. The author concludes that some scholars began to evaluate the usefulness of such weapons and the doctrine that shone to find a balance between the benefits and risks of nuclear deterrence.

Результаты (английский) 3:

the reason for this may be that the global policies of the 21st century is profoundly different from the period of the cold war. that's exactly what your article writes james doyle (2013). from his point of view.the problem of nuclear non-proliferation in the new states and the matter of security differs substantially from the previous century.moreover, the historical events that led to the end of the cold war had undermined the credibility of nuclear weapons and to contain it.thus came the opportunity to ensure the national security of many countries.further, the author concludes that some scientists have evaluated the usefulness of such weapons and to find a balance between shined exercises that use and the risk of nuclear deterrence.