Нормы общего права в течение столет

Нормы общего права в течение столетий дополнялись или заменялись нормами статутного права, образовав в результате особый достаточно гибкий ϲʙᴏд правил. Ф. М. Решетников и Т. В. Апарова в предисловии к русскому переводу книги Р. Кросса о прецедентном праве отмечают, что «судебный прецедент и парламентский акт существуют как два равноправных, тесно взаимодействующих источника права, и существование одного немыслимо без другого»1. При ϶ᴛᴏм еще раз следует подчеркнуть: прецедент как источник права подчинен законодательству. Что же касается использования прецедентов при толковании статутов, то ϶ᴛᴏ происходит весьма часто.
Вместе с тем история свидетельствует, что законодатель, как правило, исходил из того, «что статутное право не должно противоречить принципам общего права, а тем более отменять его. Законы либо декларировали, либо исправляли некᴏᴛᴏᴩые нормы общего права»2. Часть юристов и сегодня аналогичным образом оценивает статутное право. И действительно, очень часто закон исключительно воплощает нормы, выработанные общим правом.
Стоит отметить, что основные принципы уголовной ответственности по-прежнему устанавливаются нормами общего права, хотя некᴏᴛᴏᴩые из них, например, касающиеся сговора и покушения, получили законодательную регламентацию.

Результаты (английский) 1:

The common law for centuries supplemented or replaced by statutory law, formed as a result of special flexible ϲʙ ᴏ d rules. F. m. Reshetnikov and t. Aparova in the preface to the Russian translation of the book by r. Cross case law noted that "judicial precedent and act of Parliament exist as two peer closely interacting source of law, and the existence of one without the other" 1. When ϶ ᴛ ᴏ m again it should be stressed: the precedent as a source of law is subordinate to the law. As regards the use of precedents in the interpretation of statutes, ϶ ᴛ ᴏ happens very often.However, history shows that the legislator usually assumed that statutory right should not contradict the principles of the common law, and even more so to abolish it. Laws or declared, or fixed neck ᴏ ᴛ ᴏ s ᴩ the common law "2. Part of the legal profession and today similarly estimates statutory law. Indeed, very often the law exclusively embodies the rules developed by the common law. It is worth noting that the basic principles of criminal responsibility is still mounted common law, although the neck ᴏ ᴛ ᴏ s ᴩ of them, for example, relating to conspiracy and attempt, got the legislative regulation.

Результаты (английский) 2:

Common law for centuries, supplement or replace the rules of statutory law, formed as a result of a special flexible enough ςʙᴏd rules. Fyodor Reshetnikov and T. Aparova in the preface to the Russian translation of the book by R. Cross case law noted that "judicial precedent and an Act of Parliament exist as two equal, closely interacting source of law, and the existence of one without the other" 1 . When ϶ᴛᴏm should be emphasized once again that precedent as a source of rights is subject to the legislation. As for the use of precedents in the interpretation of statutes, the ϶ᴛᴏ happens very often.
However, history shows that the legislator, as a rule, based on the fact that "statutory law should not contradict the principles of the common law, and even more so to abolish it. Laws either declared or corrected nekᴏᴛᴏᴩye common law. "2 Some lawyers and today the same way evaluates the statutory law. Indeed, very often, the law only embodies standards developed common law.
It should be noted that the basic principles of criminal responsibility is still established common law, although nekᴏᴛᴏᴩye of them, for example, concerning the conspiracy and assassination, received legislative regulation.

Результаты (английский) 3:

the common law for centuries have been supplemented or replaced by statutory law, formed from a flexible enough ϲʙᴏд rules. s. m. решетников etc. in the. in the preface to the english translation of the book апарова r. cross case law point out that the judicial precedent and an act of parliament existed as two equal closely interacting sources of law, and the existence of one impossible without другого»1. in ϶ᴛᴏм again should emphasize: precedent as a source of law is subordinate to the law. with regard to the use of precedents in the interpretation of statutes, ϶ᴛᴏ happens very often.however, history shows that the generally assumed "that the statutory law must not contradict the principles of the common law, or even cancel it. the laws of either declared or had некᴏᴛᴏᴩые norm of general права»2. some lawyers and similarly the statutory law. and, indeed, very often the only embodies the rules of the common law.it should be noted that the basic principles of criminal responsibility continues to set the rules of common law, although некᴏᴛᴏᴩые of them, for example for conspiracy and attempt, gained legislative regulation.